Fatcow Icon
Elections: Daniel, Rowe to square off in School Board Dist. 3
by Jennifer Shrader
Staff writer
Aug 01, 2012 | 2504 views | 5 5 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print

The leader of “Team ABCD,” four candidates who set out to unseat incumbents on the Troup County Board of Education, will face a runoff Aug. 21.

Voters in District Three will go back to elect Dariel Daniel or incumbent Sheila Rowe, the top two vote-getters Tuesday.

Daniel received 41.95 percent of the vote and Rowe, who has been on the school board 17 years, received 46.64 percent.

June Hogan, a third challenger, received 11.25 percent and said late Tuesday she would tell her supporters to vote for Rowe when they go back to the polls.

“My whole motivation for running was to block (Team ABCD) from getting on the school board,” Hogan said. “I will be voting for Sheila Rowe.”

Rowe said she would regroup and focus on getting supporters to the polls for the runoff.

“I understand that I have to work harder,” she said.

Daniel also was disappointed.

“I am disappointed there are that many people that still wanted the same school board,” he said. “I got 800 votes and that means 800 people are ready for change.”

Daniel was the unofficial leader of “Team ABCD,” a group of school board challengers made up of himself, Frank Barnes, Tommy Callaway and Ashley Adams. Adams was successful in beating incumbent John Darden but Barnes and Callaway were defeated by Dianne Matthews and Debbie Burdette in their districts.

Daniel also was the target of an advertising campaign led by the Citizens for The Future of Troup County, a group made up of elected and other community leaders who made a push late before the election to discredit challengers to several local races. Daniel and Callaway both were targeted by negative advertising sent to voters.

Daniel’s ad said he failed to pay his state taxes and owed Georgia more than $14,000. Daniel countered the claim and said the taxes were owed on money he actually made while working in Texas that the state was trying to tax here. He said his accountant was negotiating with the state and he would pay the due amount when an agreement was reached.



Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
heartland
|
August 03, 2012
Some new letters for mr, Daniel.......Tax Cheat! How can we trust you with our tax dollars when you were not truthful about your money problems. You signed a statement when you qualified that you did not owe taxes. Then you said the rules did not apply to you on the sign ordinance. I guess the rules did not apply to you when you entered two South Africans illegally in an Arizona wrestling event. More to come thru open records request thru the school records.

Snoopey21
smokeymoose
|
August 02, 2012
To Mr. Daniels and Mrs. Rowe:

As citizens we keep hearing that the problems in our schools originate from the home. Let's go with that for a minute.

If a parent fails to feed their child it is child endangerment. If a parent fails to clothe their child or provide medical care for a child it is child endangerment. If a parent drives drunk with a child in the car it is child endangerment.

If a parent fails to participate in a child’s education and doesn't do everything possible to educate their child is this not child endangerment?

What avenues can the school board pursue through the legal system to insure compliance at home?

Are you willing to pursue these avenues if elected?

Now let's go with this for a minute. Pension and retirement funds. These disappeared a long time ago in the private sector. Across this country cities and states are having to address these issues and in some cases filing bankruptcy. As more and more teachers retire at a younger age the liability for these pensions and medical costs increase yearly. Do you feel that the retirement and medical plans should be examined to project the impact of these plans in years to come?

Are you willing to do it? Has anyone did a projection showing what % of the total budget these programs will be in the future?

udkwhatutalkingabout
|
August 03, 2012
I believe the word you are looking for is neglect, not endangerment; except for the statment about driving intoxicated, that is endangerment. The sad truth is, in the world we live in, more and more children are being raised by a single parent who is doing their best to provide food, clothing, shelter and keep the lights on. Managing work, home, and kids by yourself is a tough job. Every teacher should be capable of teaching students with every learning style. Maybe this will help children get the most out of class instruction and the knowledge will be retained in a child's mind. Legaly, parents have the right to raise their children as they see fit without interference from a third party. Are you implying that you would like the school board to have your parental rights taken away because some parents may work second shift and cannot help a child with homework after school. That could very well come back and bite you in the rear if it were to happen and your child had a problem or got in a bit of trouble, you would be blamed. Exactly what "problems" are you referring to? In my opinion the 800 people who voted for Daniel never had him as a teacher.
Valdamara
|
August 01, 2012
Sounds like we're just sitting here jumping through ropes — jumping ropes all day.
smokeymoose
|
August 04, 2012
Cry me a river. Been there and done that. As a single father of three who have all earned advanced degrees it wasn't easy. But it was my responsibility and I lived up to it without the assistance of the state.

1 – Where is the single dad? Out looking to put another notch in his belt while the single mother struggles?

2 – If the single works 2nd shift who watches the child while she works? Should that person not be able to work with the child?

3 – Is there a rule that says single mom is not allowed to review the child’s homework after she gets off work?

Concerned about the governments interference with my parental rights? Not really. As long as I accept responsibility for my children and provide for them the government is way to busy helping single mom to bother with someone who is actually providing without their assistance.

You offer nothing but a smoke screen and a diversion. Is that you Obama?

Let me simplify it for you. Little Johnny is entitled to a free education. Little Johnny's parent/parents have the responsibility to see that little Johnny takes maximum advantage of that opportunity. If little Johnny's parent/parents do not take responsibility little Johnny's parent/parents should cut a little weeds along the road as a refresher in responsible parenting.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: